Tesla đã bắt đầu thử nghiệm Cybercab, một robotaxi tự hành hoàn toàn không có vô lăng hay bàn đạp, trên đường công cộng tại Austin, Texas. Động thái này diễn ra gần hai năm sau khi thiết kế Cybercab được công bố và sau khi dịch vụ robotaxi dựa trên Model Y của Tesla đã hoạt động tại đây.
Vì sao nên đọc: Những tiến bộ mới của Tesla trong robotaxi tự động không cần lái bàn đạp và bánh lái sẽ giúp bạn hiểu rõ hơn về tương lai của giao thông thông minh và cách các công ty đang cạnh tranh trong lĩnh vực AI tự động hóa.
Trả lời 3 câu hỏi ngắn để nhận điểm thưởng cho bài này. Chỉ làm khi bạn muốn lấy điểm.
3 câu hỏi · dưới một phút · không bắt buộc
Nguồn: https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/30/tesla-starts-testing-cybercab-without-pedals-or-a-steering-wheel-in-austin. 8sync News chỉ tóm tắt và dẫn link; bản quyền nội dung thuộc tác giả và nguồn gốc.
Tesla has begun testing a production Cybercab — with no steering wheel or pedals — on public roads in Austin, Texas. A safety monitor rides in the passenger seat while the vehicle operates entirely on autonomous software. This marks the first time Tesla has put a vehicle without manual controls on public roads, a significant step from earlier prototypes that retained a steering wheel and pedals. The move coincides with NHTSA's proposal to remove the federal requirement for brake pedals in fully automated vehicles. Tesla currently operates 42 robotaxis in Texas compared to Waymo's 577, and sees the purpose-built Cybercab — targeting a sub-$30,000 price and camera-only perception — as its path to cost-competitive scaling. The Austin fleet has logged 17 incidents since July 2025, and both Tesla and Waymo continue to encounter edge cases as they scale autonomous operations.
Tesla has quietly settled a lawsuit stemming from a 2023 fatal crash involving its Full Self-Driving (Supervised) system in Arizona, where a 71-year-old pedestrian was struck and killed by a Model Y. The settlement terms were not disclosed. However, the NHTSA federal investigation — escalated to an engineering analysis in March 2026 — remains open and could result in a software recall. The agency found Tesla's system fails to detect and warn drivers under degraded visibility conditions like sun glare and airborne dust. Compounding Tesla's troubles, a separate fatal crash in Texas involving Autopilot has triggered additional NHTSA and NTSB investigations, and another inquiry is examining FSD running red lights and drifting into wrong lanes. Tesla's camera-only approach faces mounting regulatory and legal scrutiny as the company positions FSD as central to its AI and robotics identity.
Proception, a robotics startup founded by ex-Tesla Optimus engineer Jay Li, has settled a year-long trade secret lawsuit with Tesla and raised an $11M seed round led by First Round Capital. The company is now shipping its first dexterous robotic hands — featuring 22 degrees of freedom and a sensor-laden glove for scalable training data collection — to researchers and robotics companies. Tesla had sued Li in June 2025, alleging he downloaded confidential files before leaving to found Proception. The dexterous hand market is heating up globally, with competitors like China's Linkerbot dominating market share and European and Chinese startups raising hundreds of millions. Proception is betting that humanoid robot makers will outsource hand manufacturing rather than build in-house, positioning itself as a key supplier in the emerging humanoid robot supply chain.
The family of a 76-year-old woman killed when a Tesla Model 3 crashed into their Katy, Texas home has filed a wrongful-death lawsuit against Tesla and the driver, alleging defective driver-assistance design. The driver claims Autopilot was engaged at the time; Tesla counters that vehicle data shows the driver manually pressed the accelerator to 100% reaching 73mph. The case draws on the legal precedent set by a 2025 Florida verdict that held Tesla partly liable for $243m despite driver fault. NHTSA has opened a special crash investigation and will independently pull the event data recorder. The outcome hinges on whether driver misuse and corporate design liability can coexist, a question the Florida case answered affirmatively.