Terminal agents are replacing GUI coding tools, and I stopped paying for Cursor the moment I realized

A developer shares their experience ditching Cursor Pro ($240/year) in favor of open-source terminal agents, ultimately settling on Crush. The post clarifies that most Cursor alternatives (OpenCode, Pi, Crush) are terminal agents, not GUI editors — with Zed being the closest true editor replacement. Crush won out due to seamless local LLM integration via LM Studio, auto-enumerating models without manual config, and a polished Charm-based TUI. The switch isn't without trade-offs: Cursor's tab completion is described as genuinely superior and hard to replace, and users without a capable GPU would face unpredictable API costs instead of a fixed subscription.

Nguồn: https://www.xda-developers.com/ditched-cursor-for-open-source-ai-editors-and-saved-240-a-year. 8sync News chỉ tóm tắt và dẫn link; bản quyền nội dung thuộc tác giả và nguồn gốc.

Đề xuất cho bạn

dbushell75 Hot3 phút7 ngày trướcAITop

ARIA, anti-patterns, and you

ARIA Authoring Practices Guide (APG) không phải hướng dẫn tối ưu cho website mà chỉ minh …

#webdev#html#accessibility